Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aurora Zantedeschi vs Angelica Raggi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zantedeschi vs Raggi analysis and find out who is favored!
Aurora Zantedeschi vs Angelica Raggi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zantedeschi 1 - 0 Raggi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zantedeschi has won 45.45% of points on their second serve, while Raggi has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zantedeschi, in recent form, has won 57.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Raggi has won 57.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.41% and 39.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zantedeschi has saved 50.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Raggi has saved 49.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zantedeschi has won 56.67% of matches played (W/L 34/ 26), with Raggi winning 48.57% (W/L 17/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zantedeschi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 139/ 99), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Raggi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 93/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Zantedeschi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58% of matches (W/L 29/ 21), where as Raggi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 9/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zantedeschi winning 1 times and Raggi being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zantedeschi winning 2 and Raggi winning 1. The last match between Zantedeschi and Raggi was at the W15 Ortisei, 02-11-2020, First, I.hard with Aurora Zantedeschi getting the victory 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zantedeschi and Raggi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zantedeschi winning 1 times and Raggi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zantedeschi winning 0, and Raggi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zantedeschi has played against opponents with an average rank of 310.32 while Raggi has played against players with an average rank of 138.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zantedeschi has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Raggi has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zantedeschi has converted 54.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Raggi has converted 47.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
364
Rank
364
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
847
Rank
515
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
57% (166-127)
Career Total W/L
57% (171-131)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
45% (13-16)
$2,438
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zantedeschi VS Raggi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Aurora Zantedeschi | Angelica Raggi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:26:0 | 2:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (52/96) | 53% (54/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (38/52) | 81% (44/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (25/44) | 30% (14/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (43/101) | 34% (33/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zantedeschi VS Raggi H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Angelica Raggi
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
8
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
8
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
14 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aurora Zantedeschi | Angelica Raggi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 45% (13/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (22/25) | 45% (30/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (213/223) | 51% (327/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (10/11) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 118 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:40 | 1:22:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.95 | 167.03 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1007/1458) | 63% (1003/1580) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (556/1007) | 62% (622/1003) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (205/451) | 41% (237/577) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (92/170) | 47% (92/197) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (675/1428) | 45% (723/1595) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 45% (13/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 18% (2/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 18% (17/3) |
Aurora Zantedeschi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Lucia Cortez Llorca
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Conny Perrin
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Maileen Nuudi
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Eszter Meri
69%
(
87 of
126)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
53 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Victoria Bervid
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
0
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
53%
(
33 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Angelica Raggi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Virginia Ferrara
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reka-Luca Jani
Player
Angelica Raggi
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Johanne Svendsen
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Katherine Barnes
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Pieri
Player
Angelica Raggi
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Maria Gaia Meneguzzo
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
10
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Angelica Raggi
89%
(
59 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
52 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Angelica Raggi
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zantedeschi Vs Raggi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
